来源: http://thruth.ixiezi.com/2009/07/24/4-l ... benchmark/
Intel Core 2 Duo 4.00GHz, an ASUS P5E64 WS professional motherboard (Intel X48 + ICH9R), 2GB of DDR3 memory, 160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M Serial ATA 2.0 hard drive, and an ATI Radeon X1800 256MB graphics card.
OpenSuSE 11.2 Milestone 3, Ubuntu 9.10 2009-07-15, Fedora Rawhide, and Mandriva Linux 2010 Alpha 1. The x86_64 build of each distribution was used. We then performed all development package updates as of 2009-07-15.
For OpenSuSE some of the key packages included the Linux 2.6.30 kernel, GNOME 2.26.2, X Server 1.6.1, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.2, Mesa 7.4.4, GCC 4.4, and used an EXT4 file-system.
With the Ubuntu packages there was the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.27.3, X Server 1.6.2 RC1, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.99, Mesa 7.5-rc4, GCC 4.4.0, and used an EXT4 file-system.
Running on Fedora Rawhide was the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.27.3, X Server 1.6.99.1, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.2, Mesa 7.6-devel, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT4 file-system. Lastly,
with Mandriva there was the Linux 2.6.30 kernel, GNOME 2.27.4, X Server 1.6.2, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.2, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT3 file-system.
Under the Phoronix Test Suite we ran the following test profiles: Parallel BZIP2 Compression, Apache Benchmark, GnuPG, C-Ray, timed MAFFT alignment, timed HMMer Search, PostMark, Dbench, GraphicsMagick, Sudokut, dcraw, PostgreSQL pgbench, Urban Terror, and World of Padman.
结论:
However, for the trends that can be gathered, OpenSuSE and Ubuntu were generally the fastest. The latest Ubuntu packages had slightly better performance, but they are tracking the Linux 2.6.31 kernel and some newer upstream packages compared to where OpenSuSE is at the moment.
中文说明:
http://thruth.ixiezi.com/2009/07/24/4-l ... benchmark/
OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
- oneleaf
- 论坛管理员
- 帖子: 10441
- 注册时间: 2005-03-27 0:06
- 系统: Ubuntu 12.04
-
- 帖子: 489
- 注册时间: 2008-01-14 5:27
-
- 帖子: 817
- 注册时间: 2008-11-13 16:03
Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
fedora 确实比 debian testing 慢 ,但是他的优秀是不容质疑的
- hcym
- 帖子: 15634
- 注册时间: 2007-05-06 2:46
Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
thruth
呵呵,名人都刻薄了
呵呵,名人都刻薄了
-
- 帖子: 231
- 注册时间: 2008-01-20 22:32
Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
呵呵。。。这样的评测最好是铺天盖地。。
有极大的刺激作用,刺激一下网友们的眼球,也刺激刺激MS,更刺激一下开源社区的开发者们。。。。
让评测来的更猛烈一些吧
有极大的刺激作用,刺激一下网友们的眼球,也刺激刺激MS,更刺激一下开源社区的开发者们。。。。
让评测来的更猛烈一些吧
- wiewi
- 帖子: 628
- 注册时间: 2008-11-20 22:50
- 系统: ArchLinux
Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
不看广告看疗效
===我的小窝===
无聊吗?点我吧,楼主迫切期待你的光临~~
又一个轮子
------------------------------------
这年头,没有1000贴都不好意思见人了
------------------------------------
献丑不如藏拙
------------
无聊吗?点我吧,楼主迫切期待你的光临~~
又一个轮子
------------------------------------
这年头,没有1000贴都不好意思见人了
------------------------------------
献丑不如藏拙
------------
- drvicar
- 帖子: 1285
- 注册时间: 2007-12-17 18:07
- 来自: 西安
Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
疗效还不错
可惜我的conky还没有搞好!
可惜我的conky还没有搞好!
-
- 帖子: 7
- 注册时间: 2009-08-05 11:34
Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
不错,可以参考,正在犹豫上哪个贼船~
- untitled
- 帖子: 611
- 注册时间: 2008-12-18 11:47
Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks
此人不是LINUXSIR SUSE版的版主么?hcym 写了:thruth
呵呵,名人都刻薄了