当前时区为 UTC + 8 小时



发表新帖 回复这个主题  [ 4 篇帖子 ] 
作者 内容
1 楼 
 文章标题 : Linus的口才
帖子发表于 : 2008-04-17 13:03 
头像

注册: 2005-10-04 10:59
帖子: 1928
地址: 上海
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 1
引用:
Linus Torvalds writes the Linux kernel, he also likes a good mailing list flamewar, not least because he has a very sarcasatic wit. Here he is, writing about various topics.

On fair use:

When you start thinking that you have absolute control over the content or programs you produce, and that the rest of the worlds opinions doesn't matter, you're just _wrong_.

Me, personally, I think the RIAA and the MPAA is a shithouse. They are immoral.

On virtualization:

I think what you're seeing is virtualization proponents being absolutely _desperate_ for any reason to use virtualization.

On userspace binary drivers:

No user-space ass-hattery here.

On turning off interrupt requests:

You cannot have a generic kernel driver that doesn't know about the low-level hardware (not with current hardware - you could make the "shut the f*ck up" a generic thing if you designed hardware properly, but that simply does not exist in general right now).

On those arguing for userpace interrupt request handlers:

You may be a bit simple. But I think it's more polite to call you "special". Or maybe just not very used to how hardware works.

On C++ :

In fact, in Linux we did try C++ once already, back in 1992. It sucks. Trust me...

C++ is a horrible language. It's made more horrible by the fact that a lot of substandard programmers use it, to the point where it's much much easier to generate total and utter crap with it. Quite frankly, even if the choice of C were to do *nothing* but keep the C++ programmers out, that in itself would be a huge reason to use C.

So I'm sorry, but for something like git, where efficiency was a primary objective, the "advantages" of C++ is just a huge mistake. The fact that we also piss off people who cannot see that is just a big additional advantage.

On Linux Kernel version 2.6.19:

It's one of those rare "perfect" kernels. So if it doesn't happen to compile with your config, you can rest easy knowing that it's all your own d*mn fault, and you should just fix your evil ways.

On Intel's inventions:

The fact that ACPI was designed by a group of monkeys high on LSD, and is some of the worst designs in the industry obviously makes running it at _any_ point pretty damn ugly. And the fact that MB vendors don't test it with anything else than Windows (and sometimes you wonder whether they do even that) doesn't help.

EFI is this other Intel brain-damage (the first one being ACPI). It's totally different from a normal BIOS, and was brought on by ia64, which never had a BIOS, of course. Sadly, Apple bought into the whole "BIOS bad, EFI good" hype, so we now have x86 machines with EFI as the native boot protocol.

On Apple OS X:

OS X in some ways is actually worse than Windows to program for. Their file system is complete and utter crap, which is scary.


仰视~~~


页首
 用户资料  
 
2 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-04-17 13:11 
头像

注册: 2007-08-11 20:54
帖子: 777
地址: 广州
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 0 次
老旧的东西来的,已经看了很久了


_________________
人的生命是有限的,但是享受Linux的乐趣是无限的!
http://www.liangsuilong.info


页首
 用户资料  
 
3 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-04-17 13:12 
头像

注册: 2007-11-19 21:51
帖子: 6956
地址: 成都
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 4
不知所云~~~~~~~~~~~


页首
 用户资料  
 
4 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-04-17 13:16 
头像

注册: 2005-08-14 21:55
帖子: 58428
地址: 长沙
送出感谢: 4
接收感谢: 272
flamewar?

希特勒才是演讲天才


_________________
● 鸣学


页首
 用户资料  
 
显示帖子 :  排序  
发表新帖 回复这个主题  [ 4 篇帖子 ] 

当前时区为 UTC + 8 小时


在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 2 位游客


不能 在这个版面发表主题
不能 在这个版面回复主题
不能 在这个版面编辑帖子
不能 在这个版面删除帖子
不能 在这个版面提交附件

前往 :  
本站点为公益性站点,用于推广开源自由软件,由 DiaHosting VPSBudgetVM VPS 提供服务。
我们认为:软件应可免费取得,软件工具在各种语言环境下皆可使用,且不会有任何功能上的差异;
人们应有定制和修改软件的自由,且方式不受限制,只要他们自认为合适。

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
简体中文语系由 王笑宇 翻译