列举Windows7的七宗罪状,你知道多少?

[smallapple]

自由软件基金会（FSF）周三发起了一项针对微软的Windows 7反对网站，这个网站列举了“Windows 7的七个罪状”，认为微软的存在毒害教育、侵犯隐私、垄断、强迫更新、滥用标准、DRM以及威胁用户安全问题。

这七项罪状包括：

毒害教育：微软通过游说腐化教育部门，让儿童使用的计算机采用Windows操作系统，而真正的教育用计算机应该使用自由软件和开放操作系统。

侵犯隐私：微软使用Windows Genuine Advantage去检查用户硬盘上的内容。

垄断：大多数品牌机预装的系统都是Windows，用户别无选择。

封_锁：微软通过不支持旧操作系统和旧文件格式强迫用户升级新版Windows和新版Office。

滥用标准：微软试图封 杀自由文件格式ODF，因为这项格式不是微软提出的，它将威胁到微软的垄断。

DRM：微软在Windows Media Player中限制拷贝某些媒体内容，从而保证某些大公司的利益。

威胁用户安全：Windows长期以来存在大量的安全漏洞，导致病毒蔓延，让攻击者把受害者的电脑变成僵尸网络中的一部分。用户只能依赖微软去解决安全问题，而微软基于自己的目的考虑，并不以用户需求为基准。

FSF执行董事Peter Brown称，“微软Windows限制已经变成了一个DRM平台，限制用户制作数字文件的副本”，如果对微软放任不管的话，那么微软蓄谋已久的“对用户电脑的彻底控制”就有可能实现。

他表示，上个月亚马逊Amazon.com曾强行从用户的Kindle阅读器中删除一些盗版书籍，这就是让供应商为所欲为的例子。

对于这个网站的攻击言论，微软并没有立即做出回应。FSF组织的主要工作是监管大多数开源软件的GPL许可协议，该组织近日在一次公众集会中展示了一副12英尺高巨型招贴画，内容显示Windows系统为“被丢弃的垃圾”。


来源:Cnbeta

[ask_me]

微软委了，呼唤巨硬

[tunpishuang]

多么的牵强啊。

[smallapple]

封 锁 和 封 杀 都成 囗囗了

[mickeywaley]

[luojie-dune]

http://windows7sins.org/

看原文才对。。。我不信任那些垃圾网站流出的Linux相关中文翻译。

[hcym]

smallapple也会叽歪了


MSDN版早都下好了，好处寥寥

极度彷徨中

[smallapple]

[luojie-dune]

此文分篇：


教育篇以老子的名言开头：

"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." -- Lao Tzu
“授人以鱼，不如授人以渔” - 老子

Increasingly, computers are expected to be useful tools in our children's education. But today, most children whose education involves computers are being taught to use one company's product: Microsoft's. Microsoft spends large sums on lobbyists and marketing to procure the support of educational departments.
计算机将会是是儿童教育的有力工具。但是，现在多数孩子只是被教授一件事情一类东西：微软的产品。微软利用大量说客和巨额资金进行市场活动，建立了对教育的支持。
Many US states even boast about how they are cooperating with Microsoft, either ignoring or not understanding the corrupting influence that accepting freebies from this huge corporation has on their government. Because Microsoft's software is proprietary, it is incompatible with education. Users are simply passive consumers in their interactions with Windows. They are legally forbidden from adapting the software to solve a particular problem, or from satisfying an intellectual curiosity by examining its source code. An education using the power of computers should be a means to freedom and empowerment, not an avenue for one corporation to instill its monopoly through indoctrination.

Free software, on the other hand, gives children a route to empowerment, by encouraging them to explore and learn. Nowhere was the promise of an educational platform using free software more significant than the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project. Launched by MIT professor Nicholas Negroponte in 2003, OLPC was supposed to lead children around the world to an advanced education using the combination of information technology and freedom. The project aimed to produce low-cost devices (starting with one called the XO) so that millions of children could have access to them, and free software, so they would [have the critical freedoms to explore and share their software][1].

Indeed, while it did use a small amount of nonfree software, the XO machine had taken an unprecedented step toward being a completely free software machine by replacing the traditional startup program (called the BIOS) with a free program, giving children control of the devices at a fundamental level. While previously there were many laptops capable of running a free GNU/Linux system, no manufacturer had ever published the information a developer would need to make a laptop run in this way before. Because of its free software approach, hundreds of people from the international free software community volunteered their time, skills, and money to help the project.

Then [under pressure from Microsoft] [2], the project backed away from its commitment to freedom and announced that the machine would become a platform for running the nonfree Windows XP operating system. With this pressure, Microsoft took aim at the low-cost platform as a way to make poor children around the world dependent on its products.

This reversal of [policy flew in the face of the project's stated goals of promoting freedom].[3] Many OLPC developers quit in disgust, and some members of the user community [tried to oppose the change] [4]. But Negroponte, desiring the financial support of Bill Gates and Microsoft, ignored them and proceeded with his decision. As a result, it is expected that the main effect of the OLPC project -- if it succeeds -- will be to turn millions of children into Microsoft dependents. That is a negative effect, to the point where the world would be better off if the OLPC project had never existed. The project tragically became yet another example of Microsoft exerting its control to ends harmful to society's freedom.

http://laptop.org/en/vision/index.shtml "To create educational opportunities for the world's poorest children by providing each child with a rugged, low-cost, low-power, connected laptop with content and software designed for collaborative, joyful, self-empowered learning. When children have access to this type of tool they get engaged in their own education. They learn, share, create, and collaborate. They become connected to each other, to the world and to a brighter future."

http://www.olpcnews.com/files/microsoft ... n_olpc.pdf

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/ ... onomyId=12

http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title= ... did=131155

[adam8157]

毒害教育和滥用标准确实是 罪， 其他我感觉有点牵强

[wangdu2002]

走自己的路，碾碎一切反抗者----我是微软我怕谁（虽然绝大多数男人女人都不喜欢我，但他们都不能离开我）。

[ChloeRei]

微软自己建立起来软件授权体制，发现盗版能为自己带来利益时，又纵容之

[qiii2006]

欲加之罪，何患无辞。。。。

[kwong]

BadVista vs windows7sin

[浪得虚名]

赞同十三楼。这样诋毁微软有意思么？
诸如原文中说这番话的人，不管什么目的（商业？），如果继续不顾事实诋毁微软，只会把开源阵营置于越来越孤立的境地，这种言论贻害无穷啊