当前时区为 UTC + 8 小时



发表新帖 回复这个主题  [ 7 篇帖子 ] 
作者 内容
1 楼 
 文章标题 : 几款GNOME下基于管理的播放器
帖子发表于 : 2008-06-02 10:44 

注册: 2007-09-26 9:00
帖子: 113
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 0 次
Gnome Music Player Roundup
November 15th, 2007

If you’re a Gnome user, like me, you’ve probably spent a little bit of time wondering what the best music player for Gnome is. Most people will readily agree that Amarok is the uncontested music playing champion of KDE, and many people run it with Gnome. I, however, would prefer to use an application built with GTK+ at the very least. Full Gnome integration would be ideal, but what exactly is out there?
Banshee

Banshee Screenshot
图片
Banshee, in a word, is cool. It’s a great looking program, for one. It’s very feature rich with integrated CD burning, ripping, tag editing, podcasting, Last.fm support, music sharing (via DAAP), music recommendation as well as lots of other nifty plugins. Banshee is also one of the premier applications built with Mono, which makes it even more interesting. The only problems I see here are performance issues. Banshee (especially the search feature) tends to choke on my 18,739 song library. However, Aaron and Gabriel have some very exciting things in store for us that should make slow searching a thing of the past.
Exaile

Exaile
图片
Exaile is written in Python and aims to be a GTK+ equivalent to Amarok. I’ll be honest… I don’t like Amarok, so It’s probably no surprise that I don’t really care for Exaile, either. It seemed to deal with a large library pretty gracefully and has a lot of nice features like a cover art finder and a large number of plugins. If you like Amarok, but want something that will integrate well with Gnome, give this a shot.
Listen

Listen
图片
Listen is truly an amazing piece of software. Its interface is very easy to use, probably the best execution of a “play queue” arrangement I’ve ever seen. It’s ability to dynamically grab cover art, Wikipedia articles and lyrics from the web make it very appealing to metadata junkies. It’ll also integrate somewhat with Last.fm and do some web radio and podcasting stuff. My only complaint is that I’ve had some stability issues, though I’m told they have since been resolved. Definitely give this one a shot.
Quod Libet

Quod Libet
图片
I haven’t spent much time with Quod Libet, but the degree to which it can be customized is staggering. You can choose from many different views including the iTunes style paned view or the pictured album list. In the album list, you can customize (with html, apparently) exactly how the albums are listed. The depth in which in utilizes metadata is striking and the included tag editor (Ex Falso) is handy to boot.
Rhythmbox

Rhythmbox
图片
Rhythmbox is written in C so it’s quick, it doesn’t choke on large libraries, it’s competitive in terms of features and it will actually monitor my music folder and remove songs when I delete them or add the new ones in a sensible manner. One thing it does do that is rather unique is the integrate with the Magnatune and Jamendo online music stores. It’s really just a great all around player. That’s not to say it doesn’t have it’s own little shortcomings, like how it manages to be slightly offensive to the eye, though I can never put my finger on why.
Conclusion

There is a basic feature set shared by pretty much all the players. They’ll all show you cover art (most of them will even find and download it for you), most of them will let you share your music or listen to other people’s shared music via DAAP, they all offer some level of integration with Last.fm, they’ll all provide notifications via libnotify… there are really only a few major differences in terms of features, and even those are rapidly changing due to the fact that most of the players are extensible.

Things are looking pretty good for those of us using the Gnome desktop environment. All of the players we looked at today are feature rich and very usable and give you a lot of room to decide exactly how you want to manage your music. That freedom of choice is exactly what is so special about open source software, and it’s great to see that exemplified in software that we use every day.

So which one do I use? Well, I use Sound Juicer to rip my CDs and I tag and rename all of my music with MusicBrainz PicardQT and do most of my listening with Rhythmbox and burning with Serpentine. I find Rhythmbox’s speed and stability to be the deciding factors (rather than things like integrated ripping and burning), as it’s the player whose search isn’t painfully slow. That could very well change, though, with the upcoming release of the new generation Banshee.

You’ll also notice I didn’t make any mention of iPods. I don’t own an MP3 player, especially not an iPod. I’m a very big believer in open source software and Apple and their iPod are the antithesis of that in every way. If iPod support is important with you, I’d recommend you check the sites for each individual player and see where their support is, but not before you consider picking up a more Linux-friendly player.[/img]


页首
 用户资料  
 
2 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-06-02 10:54 
头像

注册: 2005-08-14 21:55
帖子: 58428
地址: 长沙
送出感谢: 4
接收感谢: 272
一个妈妈生的。
直接rhythm吧。


_________________
● 鸣学


页首
 用户资料  
 
3 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-06-02 10:58 
头像

注册: 2007-11-19 21:51
帖子: 6956
地址: 成都
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 4
什么叫做“基于管理”?


页首
 用户资料  
 
4 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-06-02 11:01 
头像

注册: 2007-04-25 13:12
帖子: 2838
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 0 次
看着都差不多呢 :shock:


_________________
♜♞♝♛♚♝♞♜
♟♟♟♟♟♟♟♟
♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙
♖♘♗♕♔♗♘♖

☠☯⚔⚓☣☦☃☕
☹☻☪☭☬⚖⚛⚜
ℜℳℬ™ ℋℯℓ℘ ℳℭ
sƂɐʍ рǀɹoʍ əɥʇ oS


页首
 用户资料  
 
5 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-06-02 11:05 

注册: 2007-09-26 9:00
帖子: 113
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 0 次
eexpress 写道:
一个妈妈生的。
直接rhythm吧。

虽然解码器都是LINUX下那几款,但播放器可不一样的。
如果因为同一个"妈妈",何必要在各种播放器中徘徊呢?

xiooli 写道:
什么叫做“基于管理”?


KDE下有AMAROK,和audacious比较一下就知道了。


页首
 用户资料  
 
6 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-06-02 11:07 
头像

注册: 2007-09-10 20:20
帖子: 1352
地址: 南京
系统: Debian
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 0 次
rhythmbox很不错的
基于**的,已经用坏了


页首
 用户资料  
 
7 楼 
 文章标题 :
帖子发表于 : 2008-06-02 11:28 

注册: 2007-09-26 9:00
帖子: 113
送出感谢: 0 次
接收感谢: 0 次
woaiwojia 写道:
rhythmbox很不错的
基于**的,已经用坏了

承认这个不错,我个人喜欢exaile和quodlibet比rhythmbox多一点。~~
尤其是从图标的感观中。。


页首
 用户资料  
 
显示帖子 :  排序  
发表新帖 回复这个主题  [ 7 篇帖子 ] 

当前时区为 UTC + 8 小时


在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 3 位游客


不能 在这个版面发表主题
不能 在这个版面回复主题
不能 在这个版面编辑帖子
不能 在这个版面删除帖子
不能 在这个版面提交附件

前往 :  
本站点为公益性站点,用于推广开源自由软件,由 DiaHosting VPSBudgetVM VPS 提供服务。
我们认为:软件应可免费取得,软件工具在各种语言环境下皆可使用,且不会有任何功能上的差异;
人们应有定制和修改软件的自由,且方式不受限制,只要他们自认为合适。

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
简体中文语系由 王笑宇 翻译