Linux 2.6.25 下周早些时间发布……
版面规则
我们都知道新人的确很菜,也喜欢抱怨,并且带有浓厚的Windows习惯,但既然在这里询问,我们就应该有责任帮助他们解决问题,而不是直接泼冷水、简单的否定或发表对解决问题没有任何帮助的帖子。乐于分享,以人为本,这正是Ubuntu的精神所在。
我们都知道新人的确很菜,也喜欢抱怨,并且带有浓厚的Windows习惯,但既然在这里询问,我们就应该有责任帮助他们解决问题,而不是直接泼冷水、简单的否定或发表对解决问题没有任何帮助的帖子。乐于分享,以人为本,这正是Ubuntu的精神所在。
-
- 帖子: 444
- 注册时间: 2007-03-24 9:08
- 来自: 青岛
- 联系:
Linux 2.6.25 下周早些时间发布……
I really don't want to do this, and I was actually hoping to release
2.6.25 last weekend (which is why -rc9 is a few days late - just me hoping
to not do another -rc at all), but I've done an -rc9.
The changes in -rc9 are pretty small (shortlog appended), and 60% of them
are m68k updates - mostly defconfigs. And some doc updates.
But there's some network driver updates (tg3 and wireless hostap stand
out), some late XFS patches and a mvsas driver update (the mvsas driver is
new in 2.6.25, so that's not going to regress anything .
The rest is mostly one-liners, with a few reverts going on.
Dirstat:
4.2% Documentation/filesystems/
3.2% Documentation/networking/
11.4% Documentation/
55.7% arch/m68k/configs/
59.4% arch/m68k/
2.0% arch/powerpc/
65.7% arch/
3.6% drivers/net/
4.2% drivers/scsi/
12.7% drivers/
2.3% fs/
2.2% include/
3.9% net/
anyway, the reason for not doing a 2.6.25 is that some people are making
noises about slab/page-alloc setup issues, and I wanted something out this
week, but didn't feel comfy doing a final release.
That said, I think I'll have to do 2.6.25 early next week regardless,
because we can't just keep holding things back forever. At some point it
will have to turn into a 2.6.25.x issue, and the developers with stuff
pending for the next version need to be able to start merging.
Linus
2.6.25 last weekend (which is why -rc9 is a few days late - just me hoping
to not do another -rc at all), but I've done an -rc9.
The changes in -rc9 are pretty small (shortlog appended), and 60% of them
are m68k updates - mostly defconfigs. And some doc updates.
But there's some network driver updates (tg3 and wireless hostap stand
out), some late XFS patches and a mvsas driver update (the mvsas driver is
new in 2.6.25, so that's not going to regress anything .
The rest is mostly one-liners, with a few reverts going on.
Dirstat:
4.2% Documentation/filesystems/
3.2% Documentation/networking/
11.4% Documentation/
55.7% arch/m68k/configs/
59.4% arch/m68k/
2.0% arch/powerpc/
65.7% arch/
3.6% drivers/net/
4.2% drivers/scsi/
12.7% drivers/
2.3% fs/
2.2% include/
3.9% net/
anyway, the reason for not doing a 2.6.25 is that some people are making
noises about slab/page-alloc setup issues, and I wanted something out this
week, but didn't feel comfy doing a final release.
That said, I think I'll have to do 2.6.25 early next week regardless,
because we can't just keep holding things back forever. At some point it
will have to turn into a 2.6.25.x issue, and the developers with stuff
pending for the next version need to be able to start merging.
Linus
- carbont
- 帖子: 3406
- 注册时间: 2007-11-22 10:20
- 来自: 北京
-
- 帖子: 444
- 注册时间: 2007-03-24 9:08
- 来自: 青岛
- 联系:
- SecretZero
- 帖子: 1670
- 注册时间: 2007-08-30 5:39
-
- 帖子: 413
- 注册时间: 2007-07-06 0:11
- BigSnake.NET
- 帖子: 12522
- 注册时间: 2006-07-02 11:16
- 来自: 廣州
- 联系:
- carbont
- 帖子: 3406
- 注册时间: 2007-11-22 10:20
- 来自: 北京
- liangsuilong
- 帖子: 777
- 注册时间: 2007-08-11 20:54
- 来自: 广州
- 联系:
- BigSnake.NET
- 帖子: 12522
- 注册时间: 2006-07-02 11:16
- 来自: 廣州
- 联系:
- sfbi
- 帖子: 796
- 注册时间: 2007-09-06 11:41
- 来自: Bergen
2.6.25显然是稳定版的内核。carbont 写了:发也不会用的--奇数是不稳定版本,我等水平,不是找死么……
按照linux内核的命名规则,比如a.b.c.d,只有第二位b的奇偶性是指示开发版或稳定版的。不妨参考http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel
如果要举例子,比如1.x的时代,比如ubuntu dapper的2.6.15,比如Fedora 9是基于2.6.25的。
不过说实话,因为我只用过半个月的ubuntu,印象中ub的内核号似乎是根据自己的改动排的(当然主要是后两位了,前两位比如2.6是一致的),所以ub是不是倾向于不采用奇数,那我就不知道了。不知道8.10会如何,不过也许那时候2.6.26又出来了,呵呵。
-
- 帖子: 444
- 注册时间: 2007-03-24 9:08
- 来自: 青岛
- 联系:
不是,ub最后一位是自己排的如2.6.24-16的16,好像是基于2.6.24.4内核……sfbi 写了:2.6.25显然是稳定版的内核。carbont 写了:发也不会用的--奇数是不稳定版本,我等水平,不是找死么……
按照linux内核的命名规则,比如a.b.c.d,只有第二位b的奇偶性是指示开发版或稳定版的。不妨参考http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel
如果要举例子,比如1.x的时代,比如ubuntu dapper的2.6.15,比如Fedora 9是基于2.6.25的。
不过说实话,因为我只用过半个月的ubuntu,印象中ub的内核号似乎是根据自己的改动排的(当然主要是后两位了,前两位比如2.6是一致的),所以ub是不是倾向于不采用奇数,那我就不知道了。
- sfbi
- 帖子: 796
- 注册时间: 2007-09-06 11:41
- 来自: Bergen
-
- 帖子: 413
- 注册时间: 2007-07-06 0:11
-
- 帖子: 444
- 注册时间: 2007-03-24 9:08
- 来自: 青岛
- 联系:
看的版本少了,呵呵kingsong1126 写了:从未在正式发行版中见到第三位是奇数的情况,大版本号和小版本号是偶数是稳定版本,那为什么奇数第三位不出现在发行版中,谁来解释?我很困惑
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora
把最后一位换成任意的发行版,看看每个版本的内核吧……