分页: 1 / 2

谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 10:24
fsfjdwh
:em20,我实在体会不到这种改变的好处!Empathy比pidgin有什么过人之处?请教。

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 10:29
懒蜗牛Gentoo
:em23

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 10:35
nuanhuai
继续用皮筋

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 10:49
mickeywaley
继续pidgin :em11

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 11:41
woaiwojia
继续pidgin

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 11:44
wzssyqa
呵呵,干掉之

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 12:03
luojie-dune
Empathy is lightweight and faster and much more simple; why do I choose GNOME - simple.

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 12:07
john.wu
http://www.workswithu.com/2009/09/15/pi ... omparison/
Pidgin lacks working video-chat support (in principle it can be enabled, but I’ve yet to hear of anyone besides the developers who’s managed to use it), but it offers a couple of other important features that Empathy still lacks. Ideally, all of these features would be implemented in both clients, but until then, this sounds like an equitable trade off.

To reiterate an assertion I made a couple of weeks ago when first writing about the Empathy/Pidgin controversy in Ubuntu 9.10, the overwhelming similarity between the two clients proves that this should be a non-issue. At this point, the Ubuntu developers might as well stick with Empathy, since it’s already made it through the alpha releases, and focus their energies on more pressing concerns.
不做不明真相的群众,

google.com (非google.cn) 关键词: Empathy pidgin why 9.10

最大的区别是,pidgin不支持视频聊天, empathy支持视频聊天,当然语音聊天二者都支持。

ubuntu官方还是用了心思的。

原文中的表格,x表示的是支持


再次感谢伟大的google.

再baidu 关建词:Empathy pidgin why 9.10

baidu 很囧

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 12:10
jarryson
google talk是可以视频的。

我觉得pidgin是不会这样死掉的

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 12:16
john.wu
jarryson 写了:google talk是可以视频的。

我觉得pidgin是不会这样死掉的
http://www.workswithu.com/2009/08/24/re ... buntu-910/

Empathy advocates responded that the decision to switch to Empathy resulted not from Pidgin’s lack of video support as the appeal of Empathy’s Telepathy framework, which offers a rich infrastructure for desktop collaboration that Pidgin will likely never implement. Telepathy’s built-in support for remote desktop sharing, for example, was cited as a major advantage over Pidgin.
所谓infrastructure比pidigin好

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 12:23
john.wu
9。10特性冻结日期为 August 27th 2009 . 特性定义冻结日期为 June 18th 2009, pidigin在此期间的情况需要考证。


我猜想是ubuntu 9.10特性冻结时,pidigin的roadmap还不能支持视频聊天, 虽然现在pidigin也已经支持视频,

由此可看出, 开源软件之间的竞争,是很激烈的, 其不同阵营的用户之间争吵,也万分激烈。

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 13:45
luojie-dune
Pidgin should have the feature finished by the end of last year GSOC, but they were too lazy to merge.

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 20:22
jarryson
empathy替代pidgin也可以理解。empathy和gnome集成比较紧密。。

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 20:27
tenzu
感觉不是小生认识的ubuntu了,伤感

Re: 谁知道为什么用Empathy取替pidgin??

发表于 : 2009-10-16 20:27
wangdu2002
某有一个老菜鸟的问题:某已知empathy和pidgin,都可以使用其他即时通讯软件的协议,如Msn,Gtalk,QQ之类的。某的问题是,它们自己有没有建设专门的服务器,有自己的专门的开源协议,这样搞出一批Linux用户群出来? :em09