OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

最新ubuntu/linux/开源新闻或者其它IT相关资讯
回复
头像
oneleaf
论坛管理员
帖子: 10441
注册时间: 2005-03-27 0:06
系统: Ubuntu 12.04

OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#1

帖子 oneleaf » 2009-07-24 18:17

来源: http://thruth.ixiezi.com/2009/07/24/4-l ... benchmark/

Intel Core 2 Duo 4.00GHz, an ASUS P5E64 WS professional motherboard (Intel X48 + ICH9R), 2GB of DDR3 memory, 160GB Western Digital WD1600JS-00M Serial ATA 2.0 hard drive, and an ATI Radeon X1800 256MB graphics card.

OpenSuSE 11.2 Milestone 3, Ubuntu 9.10 2009-07-15, Fedora Rawhide, and Mandriva Linux 2010 Alpha 1. The x86_64 build of each distribution was used. We then performed all development package updates as of 2009-07-15.

For OpenSuSE some of the key packages included the Linux 2.6.30 kernel, GNOME 2.26.2, X Server 1.6.1, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.2, Mesa 7.4.4, GCC 4.4, and used an EXT4 file-system.

With the Ubuntu packages there was the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.27.3, X Server 1.6.2 RC1, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.99, Mesa 7.5-rc4, GCC 4.4.0, and used an EXT4 file-system.

Running on Fedora Rawhide was the Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.27.3, X Server 1.6.99.1, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.2, Mesa 7.6-devel, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT4 file-system. Lastly,

with Mandriva there was the Linux 2.6.30 kernel, GNOME 2.27.4, X Server 1.6.2, xf86-video-radeon 6.12.2, GCC 4.4.0, and an EXT3 file-system.

Under the Phoronix Test Suite we ran the following test profiles: Parallel BZIP2 Compression, Apache Benchmark, GnuPG, C-Ray, timed MAFFT alignment, timed HMMer Search, PostMark, Dbench, GraphicsMagick, Sudokut, dcraw, PostgreSQL pgbench, Urban Terror, and World of Padman.

结论:
However, for the trends that can be gathered, OpenSuSE and Ubuntu were generally the fastest. The latest Ubuntu packages had slightly better performance, but they are tracking the Linux 2.6.31 kernel and some newer upstream packages compared to where OpenSuSE is at the moment.

中文说明:
http://thruth.ixiezi.com/2009/07/24/4-l ... benchmark/
muziyumumu
帖子: 489
注册时间: 2008-01-14 5:27

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#2

帖子 muziyumumu » 2009-07-24 19:37

消灭0回复 :em06
onelynx
帖子: 817
注册时间: 2008-11-13 16:03

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#3

帖子 onelynx » 2009-07-24 19:46

fedora 确实比 debian testing 慢 ,但是他的优秀是不容质疑的
头像
hcym
帖子: 15634
注册时间: 2007-05-06 2:46

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#4

帖子 hcym » 2009-07-24 19:53

thruth

呵呵,名人都刻薄了

:em04
fujianwzh
帖子: 231
注册时间: 2008-01-20 22:32

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#5

帖子 fujianwzh » 2009-07-25 19:28

呵呵。。。这样的评测最好是铺天盖地。。

有极大的刺激作用,刺激一下网友们的眼球,也刺激刺激MS,更刺激一下开源社区的开发者们。。。。

让评测来的更猛烈一些吧
头像
wiewi
帖子: 628
注册时间: 2008-11-20 22:50
系统: ArchLinux

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#6

帖子 wiewi » 2009-07-27 20:47

不看广告看疗效
===我的小窝===
无聊吗?点我吧,楼主迫切期待你的光临~~
又一个轮子
------------------------------------
这年头,没有1000贴都不好意思见人了
------------------------------------
献丑不如藏拙
------------
头像
drvicar
帖子: 1285
注册时间: 2007-12-17 18:07
来自: 西安

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#7

帖子 drvicar » 2009-07-30 16:10

:em05 疗效还不错
可惜我的conky还没有搞好!
suzhouvip
帖子: 7
注册时间: 2009-08-05 11:34

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#8

帖子 suzhouvip » 2009-08-05 11:51

不错,可以参考,正在犹豫上哪个贼船~
头像
untitled
帖子: 611
注册时间: 2008-12-18 11:47

Re: OpenSuSE, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva Benchmarks

#9

帖子 untitled » 2009-08-07 14:39

hcym 写了:thruth

呵呵,名人都刻薄了

:em04
此人不是LINUXSIR SUSE版的版主么?
回复