[新闻]pps网络电视出ubuntu版了

[xxh21cn]

http://dl.pps.tv/

[aric286]

我晕，终于出了，好期待阿！我是沙发呵呵

[skyx]

虽然pps出linux版是好事，但修改了mplayer程序，却不公开源码，违反了mplayer的GPLv2协议.

GPLv2中文版
http://www.thebigfly.com/gnu/gpl/
GPLv2英文版
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html
mplayer版权：
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/info.html
违反GPL， 如何取证，如何判定，应该向谁举报：
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html
科技部知识产权事务中心副主任杨林村就利用开源软件可能存在的风险所做分析：
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=222709&start=0

If you think you see a violation of the GNU GPL, LGPL, AGPL, or FDL, the first thing you should do is double-check the facts:

* Does the distribution contain a copy of the License?
* Does it clearly state which software is covered by the License? Does it say anything misleading, perhaps giving the impression that something is covered by the License when in fact it is not?
* Is source code included in the distribution?
* Is a written offer for source code included with a distribution of just binaries?
* Is the available source code complete, or is it designed for linking in other non-free modules?

If there seems to be a real violation, the next thing you need to do is record the details carefully:

* the precise name of the product
* the name of the person or organization distributing it
* email addresses, postal addresses and phone numbers for how to contact the distributor(s)
* the exact name of the package whose license is violated
* how the license was violated:
o Is the copyright notice of the copyright holder included?
o Is the source code completely missing?
o Is there a written offer for source that's incomplete in some way? This could happen if it provides a contact address or network URL that's somehow incorrect.
o Is there a copy of the license included in the distribution?
o Is some of the source available, but not all? If so, what parts are missing?

The more of these details that you have, the easier it is for the copyright holder to pursue the matter.

Once you have collected the details, you should send a precise report to the copyright holder of the packages that are being misused. The copyright holder is the one who is legally authorized to take action to enforce the license.

If the copyright holder is the Free Software Foundation, please send the report to <license-violation@gnu.org>. It's important that we be able to write back to you to get more information about the violation or product. So, if you use an anonymous remailer, please provide a return path of some sort. If you'd like to encrypt your correspondence, just send a brief mail saying so, and we'll make appropriate arrangements.

Note that the GPL, and other copyleft licenses, are copyright licenses. This means that only the copyright holders are empowered to act against violations. The FSF acts on all GPL violations reported on FSF copyrighted code, and we offer assistance to any other copyright holder who wishes to do the same.

But, we cannot act on our own if we do not hold copyright. Thus, be sure to find out who the copyright holders of the software are before reporting a violation.

[xjpvictor]

不错。pplive刚弄好，期待加到gmlive里去。。

[skyx]

不错。pplive刚弄好，期待加到gmlive里去。。

斗篷男没得忙了。

[delectate]

斗篷男，快，看你得了！

[jarryson]

瓦！！！不错

快，谁给写个前端。简单点就可以了，外调用mplayer播放，就像gspocast一样

[jarryson]

看样子pps提供了很多库文件，说不定可以有更高级的应用

哦不对。。。怎么感觉是还给mplayer打了补丁的？还需要专门的mplayer？

[delectate]

晕

代码： 全选

[pps_callback]: server connecting timeout.

[istartagain]

晕

代码： 全选

[pps_callback]: server connecting timeout.

aye

[daf3707]

围观 测试

[aric286]

我也出现上面到错误timeout

[daf3707]

我也出现上面到错误timeout

[wangdu2002]

召唤Lerosua老大来共享好消息。

[jackallen]

权限问题，sudo 试试
我这反正是sudo了还提示没有解码器啥的
懒得折腾了