Gstreamer-plugin的good/bad/ugly有什么区别

[ido4fun]

如题

哪位达人点解一下吧

暗自觉得这种帖子会是重复贴，但放狗搜了一下，并没有搜到合适的信息，
论坛搜索也没有，所以哪位不吝赐教下吧

[highwind]

也想问一下。

[skyx]

解码器的版权问题， 开发人员也很头疼，good并不表示质量好，只是说good的包没有什么版权问题

ugly并不表示软件的质量差，有可能扯进了一些商业私有版权库。

请楼下被充：

[luojie-dune]

gstreamer

Good： This package contains the GStreamer plugins from the "good" set, a set of high quality plug-ins under the LGPL license or according to Gstreamer, "contains a set of well-supported plug-ins under our preferred license".

Bad： GStreamer Bad Plug-ins comprises a set of plug-ins not up-to-par compared to the rest. They might closely approach good-quality plugins, but they lack something: perhaps a good code review, some documentation, a set of tests, a real live maintainer, or some actual wide use.


Ugly ： This package contains plugins from the "ugly" set, a set of good-quality plug-ins that might pose distribution problems.

Good 和 Bad都是没啥大毛病。

ugly特殊，可能有问题。

[skyx]

谢谢楼上被充

[leeaman]

学习一下，英文不太好哦