[转帖] Linux没有Windows安全的理由:易受外星人入侵
- skyx
- 论坛版主
- 帖子: 9202
- 注册时间: 2006-12-23 13:46
- 来自: Azores Islands
- 联系:
[转帖] Linux没有Windows安全的理由:易受外星人入侵
英国权威媒体卫报 (Guardian Newspapers)报道:“科学家研究表明,地球上的电脑很可能遭到外星人的入侵。”目前还没有证据显示Linux能够幸免于这样的入侵。
而Windows就没有这样的安全隐患,因为来自Forrester的报道指出“微软是唯一一个100%修正已知漏洞的软件厂商”,“Windows在所有评测的平台当中漏洞及‘高危’漏洞的数目都是最少的”。
上述信息显然绝对可靠,因为它是来自微软官方的“Get the FUD”网站。
外星高级智慧生命如何侵入Linux
既然外星人可以进行星际远航来到地球,他们的科技水平显然远在我们之上。由于开源社区接受来自任何生命体编写的代码,因此不难想象是这些家伙帮助推进了地球上的开源软件运动;它们的科技是如此先进,因此也不难想象其代码中含有隐藏指令会在适当的时候启动并令我们的一切防御体系瘫痪。
我们知道Linux之父Linus Torvalds或者Apache等大型开源项目在接受代码前都会进行仔细的检查。但别忘了我们现在谈论的是超前我们很多的外星智慧体,即使是Linus
这样的天才也无法发现它们隐藏的恶意代码。想象一下,这样的代码也许就隐藏在一个普通的Linux硬件驱动程序中,然后和OpenOffice、XMMS
等程序中其他恶意代码片断结合,最终被一个基于Apache的网站上某条代码信息激活——即使是最为严密的五角大楼电脑网络恐怕也难于抵挡这样渗透方式,随后外星人就可以轻易地制造假目标并将美国的核武器倾泻出去……
为什么知识产权软件更安全
你有没有试过向微软提交一大堆代码要求加入下一版的Windows中?即使你的编程水平很高恐怕也要吃闭门羹。Windows和其他微软的软件——实际上所有的知识产权软件都由软件厂商员工以及经过挑选的承包商来编写,并不会接受来自陌生人的代码。
综上所述,Windows在面对外星黑客入侵威胁的时候要安全的多,最重要的是,外星人无法在Windows中隐藏代码,却可以轻易地成为Linux内核代码贡献者并在Linux中加入邪恶的“复活节彩蛋”。
你确定开源软件中的每一条代码都是来自地球人之手吗?我不这么认为。
如果你不想受到外星人的攻击,目前最保险的手段就是采用知识产权软件,我已经迫不及待想要删除简单而又稳定的Linux,换上Windows系统。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
总结
1.个人的行为只要不涉及他人的利害,个人就有完全的行动自由,不必向社会负责;他人对这个人的行为不得干涉,最多可以进行忠告,规劝或避而不理。
2.只有当个人的行为危害到他人的利益时,个人才应当接受社会或法律的惩罚。只有这时,社会才能对个人的行为有裁判权,也才能对个人施加强制力量。我们永远不能确信我们所力图扼杀的意见是谬误的;即便我们确信它是谬误的,要扼杀它也是一个罪恶。时代并不比个人更少犯错误。人们往往热心于错误胜过他们热心于真理。
http://www.newsforge.com/articles/05/12 ... ml?tid=149
Articles: Humor
Latest Linux security threat: Alien hackers
Saturday December 03, 2005 (05:51 AM GMT)
By: Robin 'Roblimo' Miller
Printer-friendly Email story
We didn't hear about this danger from flying saucer nutcases but from the ultra-respectable British publication The Guardian, which says, "According to a scientific report, planet Earth's computers are wide open to a virus attack from Little Green Men." So far, there is no evidence whatsoever that Linux is immune to alien computer viruses. Could this threat bring the spread of Linux to a halt?
Click here!
We know Windows is unlikely to fall prey to alien computer intruders because a Forrester study showed that "Microsoft was the only vendor to have corrected 100% of the publicly known flaws during the study's time period" and "Windows has the fewest vulnerabilities and the fewest 'high severity' vulnerabilities of any platform measured."
We know this information is reliable because it didn't come from some bunch of flaky Linux zealots but from Microsoft's own "Get the FUD" site.
What's more, an equally reliable source tells us that, over a year after the above report was released, Windows users have found "a 100 percent improvement in Microsoft's security in the past 12 months."
Obviously, all those Windows vulnerabilities you read about are nothing but the ravings of demented free software communists.
Or are they? Could this all be a disinformation campaign by aliens who plan to invade us?
We know that not everyone believes aliens are harmful; the folks at The Lightside certainly seem to think they're a force for good.
But can The Lightside be trusted? We did a "What's that site running?" query at Netcraft, and got an OS unknown response. This immediately makes us suspect that this site uses an alien OS and is part of an alien disinformation campaign. Or could it -- even more insidiously -- be part of a dis-disinformation campaign?
How advanced intelligences have corrupted Linux
Obviously, beings that travel interstellar distances are way beyond us technologically. It is no great stretch to realize that they helped spawn the free software movement, which accepts code contributions from all life forms. It is also no great stretch to realize that these beings are so far ahead of us that their code contains hidden instructions that will shut down all our defenses when their invasion force is ready to strike.
Yes, I know: Linus Torvalds and the Apache inner circle and other heads of big-time free software projects check all code before it is accepted. You're forgetting that we are talking about incredibly advanced aliens whose mental powers dwarf those of even genius-level earthlings like Linus. What looks to him like an innocuous device driver may in reality contain a code snippet which, when run in conjunction with another hidden code snippet in OpenOffice.org and one in XMMS, then activated by a coded message on an Apache-based Web site, may infiltrate the Pentagon's most secure computer networks and fire our entire nuclear arsenal at bogus targets.
Why proprietary software keeps you safe
Have you ever thought about submitting a great bit of code to Microsoft so they can include it in the next version of Windows? I haven't either, and even if I could program beyond the moron level I wouldn't. Windows and other Microsoft programs -- and virtually all propriety software -- is written by staff employees and a carefully-selected group of subcontractors, not by random strangers who toss stuff into online submissions bins.
Imagine a drooling alien covered with slimy green scales showing up at the personnel office in Redmond. That creature would be out the door (and in the hands of exobiologists) before you could say "Developers! Developers! Developers!"
If that same alien escaped from the scientists and returned home, you'd better believe that in his anger he'd load some sort of horrible computer virus onto his race's interplanetary radio communications so that the SETI Institute would pick it up and infect our world's computers.
As mentioned above, Windows is far too secure to be compromised by an alien. Not only that -- and this is the important part -- there is no way for that alien to hide code within Windows itself, while it could easily become a Linux kernel contributor and slip its nefarious Easter eggs into Linux.
Can you say with certainty that every contributor to every free or open source software project is an Earth human? I don't think so!
Until you can, the surest way to defend your computer against alien invaders is -- obviously -- to stick with good old-fashioned proprietary software, which is what I will do as soon as I get smart enough to run Windows instead of simple, reliable Linux.
而Windows就没有这样的安全隐患,因为来自Forrester的报道指出“微软是唯一一个100%修正已知漏洞的软件厂商”,“Windows在所有评测的平台当中漏洞及‘高危’漏洞的数目都是最少的”。
上述信息显然绝对可靠,因为它是来自微软官方的“Get the FUD”网站。
外星高级智慧生命如何侵入Linux
既然外星人可以进行星际远航来到地球,他们的科技水平显然远在我们之上。由于开源社区接受来自任何生命体编写的代码,因此不难想象是这些家伙帮助推进了地球上的开源软件运动;它们的科技是如此先进,因此也不难想象其代码中含有隐藏指令会在适当的时候启动并令我们的一切防御体系瘫痪。
我们知道Linux之父Linus Torvalds或者Apache等大型开源项目在接受代码前都会进行仔细的检查。但别忘了我们现在谈论的是超前我们很多的外星智慧体,即使是Linus
这样的天才也无法发现它们隐藏的恶意代码。想象一下,这样的代码也许就隐藏在一个普通的Linux硬件驱动程序中,然后和OpenOffice、XMMS
等程序中其他恶意代码片断结合,最终被一个基于Apache的网站上某条代码信息激活——即使是最为严密的五角大楼电脑网络恐怕也难于抵挡这样渗透方式,随后外星人就可以轻易地制造假目标并将美国的核武器倾泻出去……
为什么知识产权软件更安全
你有没有试过向微软提交一大堆代码要求加入下一版的Windows中?即使你的编程水平很高恐怕也要吃闭门羹。Windows和其他微软的软件——实际上所有的知识产权软件都由软件厂商员工以及经过挑选的承包商来编写,并不会接受来自陌生人的代码。
综上所述,Windows在面对外星黑客入侵威胁的时候要安全的多,最重要的是,外星人无法在Windows中隐藏代码,却可以轻易地成为Linux内核代码贡献者并在Linux中加入邪恶的“复活节彩蛋”。
你确定开源软件中的每一条代码都是来自地球人之手吗?我不这么认为。
如果你不想受到外星人的攻击,目前最保险的手段就是采用知识产权软件,我已经迫不及待想要删除简单而又稳定的Linux,换上Windows系统。
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
总结
1.个人的行为只要不涉及他人的利害,个人就有完全的行动自由,不必向社会负责;他人对这个人的行为不得干涉,最多可以进行忠告,规劝或避而不理。
2.只有当个人的行为危害到他人的利益时,个人才应当接受社会或法律的惩罚。只有这时,社会才能对个人的行为有裁判权,也才能对个人施加强制力量。我们永远不能确信我们所力图扼杀的意见是谬误的;即便我们确信它是谬误的,要扼杀它也是一个罪恶。时代并不比个人更少犯错误。人们往往热心于错误胜过他们热心于真理。
http://www.newsforge.com/articles/05/12 ... ml?tid=149
Articles: Humor
Latest Linux security threat: Alien hackers
Saturday December 03, 2005 (05:51 AM GMT)
By: Robin 'Roblimo' Miller
Printer-friendly Email story
We didn't hear about this danger from flying saucer nutcases but from the ultra-respectable British publication The Guardian, which says, "According to a scientific report, planet Earth's computers are wide open to a virus attack from Little Green Men." So far, there is no evidence whatsoever that Linux is immune to alien computer viruses. Could this threat bring the spread of Linux to a halt?
Click here!
We know Windows is unlikely to fall prey to alien computer intruders because a Forrester study showed that "Microsoft was the only vendor to have corrected 100% of the publicly known flaws during the study's time period" and "Windows has the fewest vulnerabilities and the fewest 'high severity' vulnerabilities of any platform measured."
We know this information is reliable because it didn't come from some bunch of flaky Linux zealots but from Microsoft's own "Get the FUD" site.
What's more, an equally reliable source tells us that, over a year after the above report was released, Windows users have found "a 100 percent improvement in Microsoft's security in the past 12 months."
Obviously, all those Windows vulnerabilities you read about are nothing but the ravings of demented free software communists.
Or are they? Could this all be a disinformation campaign by aliens who plan to invade us?
We know that not everyone believes aliens are harmful; the folks at The Lightside certainly seem to think they're a force for good.
But can The Lightside be trusted? We did a "What's that site running?" query at Netcraft, and got an OS unknown response. This immediately makes us suspect that this site uses an alien OS and is part of an alien disinformation campaign. Or could it -- even more insidiously -- be part of a dis-disinformation campaign?
How advanced intelligences have corrupted Linux
Obviously, beings that travel interstellar distances are way beyond us technologically. It is no great stretch to realize that they helped spawn the free software movement, which accepts code contributions from all life forms. It is also no great stretch to realize that these beings are so far ahead of us that their code contains hidden instructions that will shut down all our defenses when their invasion force is ready to strike.
Yes, I know: Linus Torvalds and the Apache inner circle and other heads of big-time free software projects check all code before it is accepted. You're forgetting that we are talking about incredibly advanced aliens whose mental powers dwarf those of even genius-level earthlings like Linus. What looks to him like an innocuous device driver may in reality contain a code snippet which, when run in conjunction with another hidden code snippet in OpenOffice.org and one in XMMS, then activated by a coded message on an Apache-based Web site, may infiltrate the Pentagon's most secure computer networks and fire our entire nuclear arsenal at bogus targets.
Why proprietary software keeps you safe
Have you ever thought about submitting a great bit of code to Microsoft so they can include it in the next version of Windows? I haven't either, and even if I could program beyond the moron level I wouldn't. Windows and other Microsoft programs -- and virtually all propriety software -- is written by staff employees and a carefully-selected group of subcontractors, not by random strangers who toss stuff into online submissions bins.
Imagine a drooling alien covered with slimy green scales showing up at the personnel office in Redmond. That creature would be out the door (and in the hands of exobiologists) before you could say "Developers! Developers! Developers!"
If that same alien escaped from the scientists and returned home, you'd better believe that in his anger he'd load some sort of horrible computer virus onto his race's interplanetary radio communications so that the SETI Institute would pick it up and infect our world's computers.
As mentioned above, Windows is far too secure to be compromised by an alien. Not only that -- and this is the important part -- there is no way for that alien to hide code within Windows itself, while it could easily become a Linux kernel contributor and slip its nefarious Easter eggs into Linux.
Can you say with certainty that every contributor to every free or open source software project is an Earth human? I don't think so!
Until you can, the surest way to defend your computer against alien invaders is -- obviously -- to stick with good old-fashioned proprietary software, which is what I will do as soon as I get smart enough to run Windows instead of simple, reliable Linux.
上次由 skyx 在 2007-08-17 8:08,总共编辑 3 次。
no security measure is worth anything if an attacker has physical access to the machine
- zhuqin_83
- 帖子: 10606
- 注册时间: 2006-05-13 4:02
- 联系:
- zhan
- 帖子: 1880
- 注册时间: 2005-08-15 0:04
- 来自: 南7技校
-
- 帖子: 458
- 注册时间: 2006-11-27 12:25
- bones7456
- 帖子: 8495
- 注册时间: 2006-04-12 20:05
- 来自: 杭州
- 联系:
-
- 帖子: 108
- 注册时间: 2006-10-05 23:20
- adqin
- 帖子: 1417
- 注册时间: 2007-01-24 22:07
- 来自: http://adqin.cn
- 联系:
-
- 帖子: 2376
- 注册时间: 2006-09-21 14:28