微软，没有你，寸步难行

[dr340]

今天在某个视频网站上看到一则推荐视频《微软，没有你，寸步难行》，不是广告，只是微软视频大赛的参赛作品。然而，当我耐着性子看完这朴实无华的视频后，平时颇为愤青的我，却突然无语了。
说实话，平时上上网的，或多或少能接触到不少充斥着诸如“爱国”，“自强”之类的关键词的视频。然而，真正让我看到中国的希望的片子，只有这一部……她是一个勇敢的女子，就如是皇帝的新衣里那位天真的小孩，说出了我们很多人都不敢说出来，或者根本不敢面对的真话。
理性的看这一篇视频，的确，我完全可以说，我现在用LINUX，没有微软，我照样活的好好的（当然，这也是我选择LINUX的主要原因之一，毕竟我只是个小愤青罢了）。但是，扪心自问，我说出的这些话，带有多少狡辩的意味呢，又带有多少无奈呢？
以前学政治的时候，老师反复讲到，人是社会人，是没法独自生存的。没有微软，我们网上购物，连一毛钱都没法交易。没有微软，我们去医院，医生写不出病历，配不了药。没有微软，自来水厂瘫痪，煤气厂关门，别说走路了，连生存都是个问题……
没有微软，能有我们2008的北京奥运吗？对此，我没有疑问。
这一刻，我反倒不禁羡慕起那些西部山区里那些连电脑都没见过的苦孩子们，或许，他们才是整个中国唯一站的起来的中国人吧……

视频地址
http://www.ku6.com/show/RcDlsMuytgcAxETp.html?fpv

《微软，没有你，寸步难行》
原文

北京2008，
我们因为有你而骄傲。
关于你，我们期待了很久。
你承载了太多的梦想，
和欢笑。

科技奥运，
我们因为有你而光荣。
2008，北京，闪闪发光。

微软，没有你，
我们寸步难行！
所有的梦想，和希望，
由你实现。

属于北京的，2008。
科技奥运的，2008。
微软的，2008。
2008，我们不能没有你，
微软！
数字生活。

[bones7456]

[runpin]

“微软，没有你，网络寸步难行”。
一听就是一个电脑小白春情荡漾的呻吟。鸡皮疙瘩掉了一地，皮炎平都不够用了，万维网难道是靠win支撑的？

“属于北京的，2008。”
拜托，我不想加入地域之争，可这话的意思摆明就是说哪怕近在天津，也没资格凑份子了。

就这么几秒钟对微软谄媚般歌功颂德，居然让楼主如此柔肠百转，不知道说啥了。

[hethe]

稍微有点肉麻了

[cocomama]

代码： 全选

    微软，没有你，上哪找蓝屏

            该换系统了
      补                    死
      丁                    机
      与                    共
      漏                    蓝
      洞                    屏
      齐                    一
      飞                    色

[ChloeRei]

播放：98444 评论：1143 收益：181.00元

这网站太抠门了，快10W点击的视频才给别人180块

[cenTrea]

要是我还跟以前一样在用XP，看完肯定被吓着了
但现在我觉得她就是在叫春

[Beetle]

M$的某些技术也不是盖的……

[yaoms]

M$的某些技术也不是盖的……

M$的某些技术也不是盖恣的……

[hzhan2005]

这个站有钱挣？好像国外也有这种
这种恶心的人楼主以后别理
当我们打开google方便的搜索网页时，为什么google能够如此出色地为我们服务？因为google开辟了基于linux的服务器平台
当我们打开一个网站时，为什么可以顺利地打开？因为我们的请求经过了基于linux的服务器。
为什么我们可以发送短信，因为我们发送的短信经过移动公司的linux服务器，才能准确地传送...
linux，没有你，我们寸步难行.

[me]

搞笑
历史如果没有微软
一样会有其他替代品

按照你多逻辑：
没有微软就没有世界的发展
没有盖茨就没有微软
没有盖茨他妈就没有盖茨
你现在应该激动的痛苦流涕飞去美国拜一拜他妈
感谢她为世界的发展作出的杰出贡献

楼下继续：

[lb_bn]

没有什么什么就不行了，只能说明懒虫一只。

[skyx]

Along with interesting problems, what good hackers like is other good hackers. Great hackers tend to clump together-- sometimes spectacularly so, as at Xerox Parc. So you won't attract good hackers in linear proportion to how good an environment you create for them. The tendency to clump means it's more like the square of the environment. So it's winner take all. At any given time, there are only about ten or twenty places where hackers most want to work, and if you aren't one of them, you won't just have fewer great hackers, you'll have zero.

Having great hackers is not, by itself, enough to make a company successful. It works well for Google and ITA, which are two of the hot spots right now, but it didn't help Thinking Machines or Xerox. Sun had a good run for a while, but their business model is a down elevator. In that situation, even the best hackers can't save you.

I think, though, that all other things being equal, a company that can attract great hackers will have a huge advantage. There are people who would disagree with this. When we were making the rounds of venture capital firms in the 1990s, several told us that software companies didn't win by writing great software, but through brand, and dominating channels, and doing the right deals.

They really seemed to believe this, and I think I know why. I think what a lot of VCs are looking for, at least unconsciously, is the next Microsoft. And of course if Microsoft is your model, you shouldn't be looking for companies that hope to win by writing great software. But VCs are mistaken to look for the next Microsoft, because no startup can be the next Microsoft unless some other company is prepared to bend over at just the right moment and be the next IBM.

It's a mistake to use Microsoft as a model, because their whole culture derives from that one lucky break. Microsoft is a bad data point. If you throw them out, you find that good products do tend to win in the market. What VCs should be looking for is the next Apple, or the next Google.

I think Bill Gates knows this. What worries him about Google is not the power of their brand, but the fact that they have better hackers.

[skyx]

Google is much more dangerous to Microsoft than Netscape was. Probably more dangerous than any other company has ever been. Not least because they're determined to fight. On their job listing page, they say that one of their "core values'' is "Don't be evil.'' From a company selling soybean oil or mining equipment, such a statement would merely be eccentric. But I think all of us in the computer world recognize who that is a declaration of war on.

[lb_bn]

I think Bill Gates knows this. What worries him about Google is not the power of their brand, but the fact that they have better hackers.