我们终于不用苦苦守候——ati8.41/8.42，nvidia噩梦的开始

[karron]

记得楼主曾经说过k饭喜欢这么现别人早有的东西.

[zhuqin_83]

记得楼主曾经说过k饭喜欢这么现别人早有的东西.

我有说过吗？

[jemyzhang]

不知道9600pro的支持效果如何啊，是r300还是别的，弄不懂了

[gxcooo]

如果AMD能在Linux下推出使用UVD视频回放技术的驱动和工具，那才是最震撼的

[jinjfy]

支持X1300不？

[zhuqin_83]

9500以上都支持

[juanzhewudi]

狗屁tmd，还要一个月
性能提升50%，吹吧，
是不要挣钱了
还是说明自己原来驱动故意压低了性能啊

[tipfoo]

闻到一股强烈的“葡萄酸味”

------------------------
NV Ti4200 8X

[flyingman]

真是有点等不急啦，A卡的初学者装ubuntu简直是场煎熬，装上了，那个三D特效还不全，真是郁闷得不行啊

[wyg1258]

我是N饭，纯粹路过，不打算踢馆

http://tech.sina.com.cn/n/2007-09-05/07341718942.shtml

等驱动发布后，我打算采用这个本本写个ubuntu相关的评测，希望楼主没有忽悠人。

很期待哦～～从此不再抱怨A卡了，让N fan投来羡慕的眼神～～帅

[zhuqin_83]

The ATI Radeon HD 2600PRO 256MB had performed extremely well in all of our benchmarks. The Radeon HD 2400PRO had also performed, but not nearly as fast and had lagged behind the Radeon X1300PRO. However, the Radeon HD 2400PRO is largely limited by the hardware capabilities and not the new software driver. The Radeon HD 2400PRO had performed at about twenty frames per second in Doom 3 and Quake 4, which is a bit choppy, but this GPU should perform well in a standard Linux desktop with accelerated desktop effects and also has open-source support through AMD's just-announced specifications. Though for a $50 USD graphics card there is not much to expect.

On the other hand, the ASUS Radeon HD 2600PRO 256MB had performed remarkably well under Linux. The ATI HD 2600PRO was much faster than the HD 2400PRO by two to three times and it had a noticeable advantage over the NVIDIA GeForce 8500GT. In many benchmarks, the HD 2600PRO was in sync with the GeForce 8600GT 256MB, which of course wouldn't have been possible on the older driver code-base. It is also important to keep in mind that both the Gigabyte 8500GT and 8600GT were factory overclocked. Separating the ASUS graphics card from the reference design is the heatsink. The heatsink claims to operate 20 degrees Celsius cooler, but the Linux driver doesn't currently support die temperature monitoring by the end-user. However, we had run into no thermal related issues with this mid-range graphics card and the heatsink fan was remarkably quiet. Unfortunately, the Linux driver still lacks ATI OverDrive or any form of manual overclocking support. The ASUS EAH2600PRO 256MB PCI Express graphics card costs about $100 USD and is certainly a great buy. The Radeon HD 2600PRO is also supported by the soon to be released open-source driver.

Unless you are on a very tight budget or are strictly looking to use Beryl, Compiz, or Compiz Fusion with a Linux desktop, we wouldn't suggest using the ATI Radeon HD 2400PRO 256MB. It performs slower than the ATI Radeon X1300PRO 256MB but still performs acceptable with the new driver. Meanwhile, the ATI Radeon HD 2600PRO 256MB offers an incredible value for a $100 USD price tag. The HD 2600PRO performed very well and in many of the benchmarks were similar to the Gigabyte GeForce 8600GT 256MB, which is factory overclocked beyond the reference memory and core frequencies. In fact, we believe that the ATI Radeon HD 2600PRO 256MB is the best mid-range graphics card available to Linux users. The ASUS edition of the Radeon HD 2600PRO also offers a very nice GPU heatsink.

[zhuqin_83]

继续来
8500GT(oc) v 8600GT(oc) v x1300pro v hd2400pro v hd2600pro

[speme]

对效能不是太在乎，能显示正常就成。

[skyx]

我是N饭，纯粹路过，不打算踢馆

http://tech.sina.com.cn/n/2007-09-05/07341718942.shtml

等驱动发布后，我打算采用这个本本写个ubuntu相关的评测，希望楼主没有忽悠人。

很期待哦～～从此不再抱怨A卡了，让N fan投来羡慕的眼神～～帅

等ATI的驱动ing........

资金链如果不出问题

这个评测将严阵以待，如期出炉。。。

[zhuqin_83]

我是N饭，纯粹路过，不打算踢馆

http://tech.sina.com.cn/n/2007-09-05/07341718942.shtml

等驱动发布后，我打算采用这个本本写个ubuntu相关的评测，希望楼主没有忽悠人。

很期待哦～～从此不再抱怨A卡了，让N fan投来羡慕的眼神～～帅

等ATI的驱动ing........

资金链如果不出问题

这个评测将严阵以待，如期出炉。。。

都说你是富婆了还不承认